Hello Open,

I have been following open hand for a very long time and has helped me transform myself thoroughly.

As my career I have been a telecom engineer and been in this area for couple of decades. My concern is that when anyone is conveying lot of truth like yourself and the interview above( which came to my attention and I heard when it was being done live) but there is an element which can easily be refuted by science the message will not help serve the people who are on the borderline.

I will explain five gee(FG) in as much general terms as possible so that we can decide whether it can have impact by amplifying the current issue.

FG is is new cellular technology standard which has two components
- One is support for very high frequency spectrum (25GHZ or above which is also called mmWave ) to enable much higher data speeds on the air. This part of FG is potentially using the different EMF frequency and could be a candidate to study for potential harmful effect on cells/humans.
-Second part of FG standard is just a change in software and back-end which will enable higher data speeds and better cell phone experience. This part of FG uses the same over the air EMF frequencies which have been used by cell phone for many years.

As of now the FG which mostly being deployed is second part above, the frequency(EMF) which is being used for FG is same as earlier so there should be no difference in terms on EMF. So an arguments can easily be made by mainstream is that what has changed in last year to make such a detrimental impact on the cells/immune system ?

The first part above of FG is deployed but is very very spotty right now. Only in very veryfew locations. I don't think the high frequency EMF FG has been deployed in the countries like China, Italy, Iran etc. So the argument that its impacting the cells can easily be refuted by mainstream. UNLESS is being deployed in a hidden way, but then whats the point of deploying if the cell phone devices which support are being made available now in last couple of months. Also this high frequency has to be licenced by the government and the licences have not been issued to any telecom provider in those countries.

Just wanted to bring this angle to the front as I want the messages being conveyed by you and in some parts in the interview above to maximum number of folks and not be refuted so easily. The social media is using some of the arguments above to remove the videos and also reasoning that "rumours" are prompting violence against the cell towers etc. to ban some of the very useful content.

I hope I could convey my message and would love to hear from you on this.

Love and Regards,
MB