In reply to by Open

Comment

Very informative. The principles of the natural law that Prof. Delores Cahill is employing here feels quite empowering on a personal level. However I get the sense the expression of it must differ depending on one's immediate surrounding. Perhaps one might need to consider and intuit what is the form of expressions for these universal rights that is best recognized within the collective consciousness of their immediate environment? Here where I am - in Beijing, the people who are usually left to enforce these bogus rules of lockdowns are not very educated to say the least, and certainly not very consciously embodied from a soul level. From my few experiences of confronting the regulations, ie. having to wear a mask when entering a 7/11 shops, or having to scan a health code (contact tracing) nearly everywhere I go, there often reaches a point where I can clearly see and feel that no amount of rational or even righteous argument is going to overwrite the internal programming the person has received through conditioning from a lifetime spent in a country ran by an authoritarian and illegitimate ruling body, that is - the "authority" is to be obeyed and followed, even though it may be at the cost of personal rights that some of the people I've talked to clearly understands on some level. So sometimes I simply see the interaction as planting a seed of consciousness that may or may not grow (all up to the flow now!), and aim to surrender into it even if I cannot change the seemingly immediate outcome. I've also come to discover through these interactions it is also a great way to observe the black snake, and reptilian consciousness in action, and thus begin to realign the same aspects within myself - i.e. shadow work!

On a related note, here is something else interesting that I feel may help people inform and equip themselves better in the quest to express freedom and personal sovereignty in our current world predicament. An alternative medical perspective by Dr. Tom Cowan on the foundation and flaw of our current VIR theory. According to this, and many other well-practiced doctors such as Dr. Stefan Lanka, or Dr. Andy Kaufman, what is being defined as VIR is simply organic DNA and RNA materials that is byproducts of our cell function, a reaction of the cells to environmental stimuli, and of which none have ever been isolated and proven to be the cause of diseases and ailments in a true scientific manner. I don't have a medical degree myself, but with that being said, I can feel it in my being that this is true to a much greater degree than what is being propagated on our planet at the moment. See and decide for yourselves my dear fellow Openhanders...

Blessings to all Praying Emoji

Lyra

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.